oh whiskers!

my gifs
1k 5k 10k 20k 50k 100k  hello! theme by cissysaurus
01
12
terrorbull:

rgr-pop:

I mean, the fuckery of all this is that it’s great to get cum on sometimes as long as it’s not by Hugo Schwyzer.
No, actually, let me talk about this article:
Your argument is that “facials are not degrading.” Your argument is not that “facials don’t have to be degrading,” your argument is that “facials are not degrading.”
Your argument is an intervention in a prevailing discourse about facials. If I were writing something like this, I would be like “this theorist says that facials are degrading because Dworkin or whatever.” What you do, though, is quote a woman saying “facials feel really degrading to me” in order to prove her wrong about her feelings about getting cum on her face. That’s fucked up, dude.
“Glickman further suggested that the fact that facials are also so common  in gay male pornography – where the sexual politics are radically  different – argues against the assumption that coming on someone’s face  is rooted in men’s misogyny.” There are no power relations in gay relationships. ?. Or anyway, “I did this thing that I am doing to you to a man once! Therefore it’s not misogynistic!”
“Both agreed that rather than seeing the facial as rooted in the impulse  to denigrate, it might indeed be better to view it as longing for  approval.” I have a really loving relationship with theorists who make totally bullshit and off-the-wall arguments that no one accepts. But this is too much for even me.
Also, like, please. Talk to a motherfucking women. Lots of them are okay with/into getting cum on because it’s whatever/it’s weird and funny/it’s whatever. Like, even in my women’s studies classes, when it comes up, no one acts like it’s “committing an act of violence against other women.”
Or, anyway, what if that were the case? What if most women (as Hugo is arguing) really did feel “degraded” by getting cum on? Why, as a male feminist, would you insist on writing an article about how they’re wrong about that?
Oh, right. Because you’re Hugo Schwyzer.
But getting cum on is over, now that I know H.S. is into it.
Period Blood On Schwyzer’s Face In 2K12

I’ve typed and then deleted like six different responses to this, but basically, I am going to make a concerted effort to focus on nothing but internship applications and pictures of puppies for the next however long it takes to get the bitter taste of Hugo Schwyzer Feminism out of my mouth, because there is some serious PTSD shit going on up in here right now.


Best comment

terrorbull:

rgr-pop:

I mean, the fuckery of all this is that it’s great to get cum on sometimes as long as it’s not by Hugo Schwyzer.

No, actually, let me talk about this article:

  1. Your argument is that “facials are not degrading.” Your argument is not that “facials don’t have to be degrading,” your argument is that “facials are not degrading.”
  2. Your argument is an intervention in a prevailing discourse about facials. If I were writing something like this, I would be like “this theorist says that facials are degrading because Dworkin or whatever.” What you do, though, is quote a woman saying “facials feel really degrading to me” in order to prove her wrong about her feelings about getting cum on her face. That’s fucked up, dude.
  3. “Glickman further suggested that the fact that facials are also so common in gay male pornography – where the sexual politics are radically different – argues against the assumption that coming on someone’s face is rooted in men’s misogyny.” There are no power relations in gay relationships. ?. Or anyway, “I did this thing that I am doing to you to a man once! Therefore it’s not misogynistic!”
  4. “Both agreed that rather than seeing the facial as rooted in the impulse to denigrate, it might indeed be better to view it as longing for approval.” I have a really loving relationship with theorists who make totally bullshit and off-the-wall arguments that no one accepts. But this is too much for even me.
  5. Also, like, please. Talk to a motherfucking women. Lots of them are okay with/into getting cum on because it’s whatever/it’s weird and funny/it’s whatever. Like, even in my women’s studies classes, when it comes up, no one acts like it’s “committing an act of violence against other women.”
  6. Or, anyway, what if that were the case? What if most women (as Hugo is arguing) really did feel “degraded” by getting cum on? Why, as a male feminist, would you insist on writing an article about how they’re wrong about that?
  7. Oh, right. Because you’re Hugo Schwyzer.
  8. But getting cum on is over, now that I know H.S. is into it.
  9. Period Blood On Schwyzer’s Face In 2K12

I’ve typed and then deleted like six different responses to this, but basically, I am going to make a concerted effort to focus on nothing but internship applications and pictures of puppies for the next however long it takes to get the bitter taste of Hugo Schwyzer Feminism out of my mouth, because there is some serious PTSD shit going on up in here right now.

Best comment

(Source: aloofshahbanou)

36
  1. lucypaw reblogged this from victorianaaa and added:
    I know, right? I’m sure I’ll be up to facials sounding hot again at some point but not for a while, I think.
  2. victorianaaa reblogged this from lucypaw and added:
    I couldn’t even finish that article, I feel nauseous. A facial doesn’t even sound hot anymore.
  3. write-on-red reblogged this from lucypaw
  4. maevele reblogged this from oh-whiskers and added:
    He’s ruined facials for me.
  5. dakedesu reblogged this from oh-whiskers and added:
    RRRRRRRAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRR! Look… we do NOT all have the same Squink/Squee factors. How hard is it to understand that? I...
  6. oh-whiskers reblogged this from gracklesong and added:
    Best comment
  7. librariansoul reblogged this from gracklesong and added:
    He is vile. Just—just vile.
  8. aloofshahbanou posted this